Made Tech Group PLC (MTEC) — Research Note
Executive summary
Made Tech is a UK-public-sector-focused digital, data and technology services provider that modernises legacy government IT, builds citizen-facing digital services, and increasingly embeds AI into public-service delivery. Across the covered period the business transformed from a loss-making post-IPO growth story (FY22-23) into a profitable, scaling operator — FY26 revenue up 27% to £58.9m, adjusted EBITDA up 69% to £5.9m, net cash £14.5m, and a post-year-end backlog of ~£115m underpinning upgraded FY27 guidance of £63-66m revenue and £6.3-6.6m EBITDA 2026-09-29 final results. The single most important point for valuation today: the shares trade on roughly 20x FY26 adjusted EPS and ~0.9x EV/FY27 sales, which is fair-to-cheap for a debt-free, founder-led, 27%-growing, AI-adjacent IT services specialist with highly visible contracted revenue.
Fair value estimate
- Fair value range: 50p – 65p per share (implied market cap £73m – £95m)
- Methodology: Blended EV/forward-EBITDA (10-12x FY27 guidance mid ≈ £6.45m) cross-checked with P/E (16-20x adjusted EPS trending to ~3.0p in FY27 from 2.38p in FY26).
- Key assumptions: FY27 delivers in-line with upgraded guidance; EBITDA margin continues to expand toward low-teens; net cash of ~£15m preserved; dilution from LTIP/SAYE ~4-5% annually.
- Current mcap: £70.2m. Midpoint fair value mcap: ~£84m. Upside to midpoint: ~17%.
Sector context
Technology / IT services. The quality / growth / leverage profile sits above typical UK small-cap IT services peers: 27% organic revenue growth, net cash balance sheet, UK-sovereign public-sector positioning that is structurally advantaged post-Horizon and under current procurement reform. Closest listed peer is Kainos (KNOS) — public-sector-heavy UK digital services, trades on richer multiples (~15-20x PE at larger scale). Other reference points: Softcat (SCT) (public-sector reseller, different model), Netcall (NET) (vertical SaaS/local government). On a per-pound-of-revenue basis, MTEC is materially cheaper than Kainos, reflecting scale, AIM listing, and historical delivery wobbles.
Investment thesis
- Structural tailwind the company is clearly capturing: UK Government is explicitly moving procurement toward mid-market UK-sovereign suppliers, and the £40m consortium award post-year-end (largest in Made Tech's history) is direct evidence that the Group is being favoured as the "Big IT" names (Capita/Fujitsu post-Horizon) lose share 2026-09-29 final results.
- Operating leverage is now visible, not promised: FY26 revenue +27% drove adjusted EBITDA +69% and margin from 7.5%→10.0% while admin expenses grew just 5.5%, indicating meaningful fixed-cost absorption as contractor mix fell and billable utilisation rose. CFO explicitly says further utilisation and overhead-control gains are available 2026-09-29 final results.
- AI exposure is monetised, not aspirational: Made Tech built DfE's first production AI service, is Strategic IT and Security Delivery Partner to Government Digital Service under a £19m contract, and the new "Autonomous Public Services" business line directly captures AI implementation revenue. Public-sector AI needs an implementation partner, and this is one of the few UK-sovereign scaled options 2026-09-29 final results.
Key risks
- Customer concentration: Four customers = 57% of FY26 revenue (Customer A alone 22%, up from 19%). Loss of a single central-government relationship would be material 2026-09-29 final results, note 5.
- Health & Life Sciences in decline: Failure to secure a place on NHS Digital Capability for Health 2 framework has caused the H&LS vertical to shrink, and management guides to "a materially lower contribution from Health & Life Sciences" in FY27 — a structural, not cyclical, problem 2026-09-29 final results.
- People-business margin fragility: Gross margin fell 160bps to 30.4% in FY26 due to "competitive market conditions and investments in specialist talent"; wage inflation, contractor ratios, and public-sector day-rate pressure can quickly compress a 10% EBITDA margin 2026-09-29 final results.
Operating leverage
Made Tech is a services business with partial but not pure operating leverage. Cost base is dominated by delivery headcount (£36.7m staff costs on £58.9m revenue, i.e. ~62% of revenue is people) which scales with billable hours. The leverage comes from: (i) overhead/admin costs (£12.0m in FY26, grew only 5.5% vs revenue +27%) that behave as fixed cost; (ii) utilisation (billed days / available days) which has recovered from 70% in FY23 to above 80% currently; and (iii) contractor-to-permanent mix shift that reduces unit cost of delivery as permanent headcount scales. The company explicitly quantifies: FY26 revenue +27% → EBITDA +69% → operating profit +162%. Extrapolating conservatively, a 10-20% revenue beat on FY27 (£70-80m vs £64.5m guided) at current unit economics would plausibly deliver EBITDA of £8-10m vs £6.45m guided, i.e. a 10-20% revenue surprise could translate to 25-55% additional EBITDA. This is meaningful but not "multiples of profit" software-style leverage — it is a scaled consultancy benefiting from utilisation and overhead absorption, scoring in the 55-65 range on the user's 0-100 scale rather than 80+.
Value-trap signals
- H&LS vertical in structural decline (framework exclusion, not cyclical)
- £4.3m intangible impairment in FY24 on failed SaaS products (Technology Platforms + Academy) — prior strategic capital allocation history is mixed
- Sales bookings volatile: £81.3m (FY25) → £50.7m (FY26) — lumpy quarter-to-quarter government procurement
- Customer concentration (top 4 = 57% of revenue)
- Share-based payment dilution: ~6m options exercised/granted annually vs 149m shares — ~4% annual dilution
None are individually fatal; collectively they justify a conviction haircut rather than a value-trap flag.
Earnings vs. expectations
The last ~24 months show a consistent beat-and-raise pattern. Entering FY26, consensus was £50.1m revenue / £3.9m EBITDA; by December 2025 trading update, management guided "significantly ahead" with FY26 revenue c.10% higher 2025-12-10 trading statement. By February 2026 H1 release, consensus had already moved to £55.1m / £4.8m and management said FY26 "materially ahead" 2026-02-26 interim. June 2026 trading update: £58.9m / £5.9m — ahead of recently-upgraded market expectations 2026-06-30. Post FY26 year-end, FY27 guidance upgraded again in August 2026 following the £40m contract win. The FY22-FY24 period was less clean — FY23 missed revenue (May 2023 warning on client rephasing) and FY24 revenue declined, so the 5-year pattern is "pattern of misses in FY23-24, consistent material beats FY25-26."
Conviction
Conviction: 3 (moderate).
Anchors: (i) FY27 is heavily underpinned by £115m contracted backlog so near-term EBITDA has high visibility; (ii) company-provided FY27 guidance brackets the forecast tightly (£63-66m revenue, £6.3-6.6m EBITDA); (iii) a founder-led, debt-free, cash-generative public-sector pure-play is a relatively narrow asset to value — multiple comparable peers exist.
Caveats: (i) FY22-24 earnings quality was uneven (SaaS impairments, exceptional items, operating losses) making longer-term through-cycle margin assumptions harder to anchor; (ii) small-cap AIM listing with ~146m shares outstanding plus ~6m options means ownership overhang and liquidity constraints could structurally cap the multiple.