Kromek Group plc (KMK) — Investment Research Note
Executive summary
Kromek is a UK-listed (AIM) specialty detection technology company producing cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) radiation detectors for medical imaging (SPECT, PCCT, MBI, BMD) and CBRN nuclear/bio-security applications, positioned as the only independent commercial-scale CZT producer globally. The group delivered its first-ever pre-tax profit in FY25 (£3.1m PBT, up from a £3.5m loss in FY24), driven by a transformational $37.5m Siemens Healthineers Enablement Agreement, with FY26 tracking to in-line consensus revenue of £27.2m and PBT of £2.15m 2026-05 trading update. The single most important valuation question is what "normalised" post-Siemens economics look like from FY27 onwards, when the high-margin licensing revenue tapers to ~$2.5m and underlying growth in CZT tile supply and CBRN detection needs to carry the P&L.
Fair value estimate
Range: 8p – 12p per share (mid ~10p), implying market cap £52m – £79m (mid ~£65m).
Methodology: Blended EV/EBITDA multiple on next-twelve-month adjusted EBITDA, cross-checked against management's medium-term target of £60m revenue and 30% EBITDA margin 2025-06 Capital Markets Day.
Key assumptions:
- FY26 adj EBITDA of ~£7-9m (reflecting lower Siemens contribution of $11.7m vs $20.5m in FY25, offset by underlying growth in both divisions)
- 8-10x EV/EBITDA multiple, appropriate for a specialty industrial with genuine technology moat but limited scale
- Balance sheet net debt ~£1m (post RCF draw), largely offsetting cash
Vs. current market cap of £48.5m at 7.40p: absolute upside ~35% to midpoint (range: +7% to +64%).
Sanity check on medium-term target: £60m revenue × 30% EBITDA = £18m EBITDA. At 8-10x EV/EBITDA = £144-180m enterprise value, or ~22-27p per share if achieved in 3-4 years — supportive of the upper end of the fair value range.
Sector context
Sector classification confirmed: Industrial Goods and Services (specialty technology / instruments sub-vertical). Kromek's quality/growth/leverage profile is below typical peers in this sector — it lacks the scale, diversification and consistent profitability of established peers. Listed comparables (all considerably larger):
- Halma — diversified safety/detection technology (much higher quality/valuation)
- Judges Scientific — specialty scientific instruments roll-up
- Mirion Technologies (US) — radiation detection pure-play, closest direct peer
Kromek trades at a significant scale discount reflecting its sub-£30m revenue base and only recent achievement of profitability.
Investment thesis
- Siemens Healthineers Enablement Agreement validates CZT market leadership and provides multi-year cash runway. The $37.5m contract ($30m received to date) transformed the balance sheet, enabled repayment of the Polymer N2 term loan, and delivered the first PBT in company history. Critically, the agreement is non-exclusive, allowing Kromek to continue serving other OEMs across the SPECT and CT markets 2025-09 Final Results; 2025-01-30 Interim Results.
- Structural shift from scintillator to CZT in medical imaging with Kromek as the only independent commercial-scale producer. Kromek now works with 8-9 tier-1 OEMs and is progressing to commercialisation in photon-counting CT — a large addressable market where major OEMs (ex-Canon/GE/Siemens) have no in-house CZT capability 2026-01 Interim Results.
- CBRN detection tailwinds from geopolitical spending increases. Kromek was selected under two four-year UK Government frameworks (Home Office Radiological Nuclear Detection, worth up to £84m; Resilience Framework), with initial orders of £1.7m already received, plus a £2m MoD contract in FY25 and new distributor agreements in 39 countries 2025-09 Final Results; 2026-01 Interim Results.
Key risks
- Siemens revenue tapers rapidly — underlying business must scale to compensate. Enablement revenue was £16.5m in FY25, ~£11.7m expected FY26, ~$2.5m in FY27, then zero. Excluding Siemens, H1 FY26 Advanced Imaging revenue was only £2.5m 2026-01 Interim Results. The underlying run-rate must more than double to sustain reported profits.
- Fragile cash position and history of recurrent equity/debt raises. Cash was £1.2m at 31 Oct 25 with £1m drawn on the £6m HSBC RCF (£2m more drawn post-period). Prior fundraising history includes £13m (2021), convertible loans (2022-24), £8m placing (2023), and multiple loan facilities with Polymer N2 2026-01 Interim Results; 2025-09 Final Results.
- Customer concentration and long OEM adoption cycles. Siemens represented essentially all Advanced Imaging licensing revenue in FY25, and Advanced Imaging OEM adoption typically requires 3-7 year design-in cycles before commercial supply. Delays in OEM roll-outs (or a competitor sourcing CZT in-house) would materially reset the growth trajectory [inferred from filings pattern].
Operating leverage
Kromek has material operating leverage in the mid-tier range (60/100). The cost base is dominated by high fixed manufacturing costs (CZT growth furnaces in UK and US), fixed capitalised R&D (~£4.4m/year in FY25) and admin costs of ~£16m — largely independent of revenue volume. Gross margin is highly product-mix dependent: licensing revenue carries ~100% gross margin, product ~50%, and R&D contract revenue ~30-40%. H1 FY26 illustrates the leverage vividly — revenue up ~4x (£3.7m→£15.0m) drove operating profit from a £4.8m loss to £3.2m profit; gross margin jumped from 57% to 72% 2026-01 Interim Results. Management's medium-term £60m revenue / 30% EBITDA target implies incremental EBITDA drop-through of ~40-50%. A 10-20% revenue surprise above expectations, if it came from product/licensing (not R&D contract), would add disproportionately to profit — probably 50-100% incremental EBITDA. However, absent licensing tailwinds, incremental drop-through from pure product growth is more like typical industrial economics (~25-30%).
Value-trap signals
- Repeated dilutive fundraisings across the covered period (2021 placing £13m, 2023 placing £8m, multiple convertibles)
- Historically loss-making for 10+ years — FY25 was the first-ever profit
- Late/postponed FY24 results (delayed from September to late October 2024) — a modest governance flag though ultimately delivered ahead of expectations
- Recurring reliance on related-party debt (Polymer N2 Ltd, a significant shareholder, provided £5.5m term loan plus £4.4m of additional working capital support)
- Thin trading liquidity typical of sub-£50m AIM stocks
These are meaningful concerns but are largely receding: the balance sheet has been restructured, Group is now profitable, and OEM traction is building.
Earnings vs. expectations
Recent track record has skewed to beats or in-line:
- FY24 (Oct 2024): Adj EBITDA £3.1m "ahead of market expectations" per May 2024 trading update
- FY25 (Sep 2025): Revenue £26.5m and PBT £3.1m "significantly ahead of market expectations" (May 2025 trading update flagged PBT slightly ahead; final beat was material)
- H1 FY26 (Jan 2026): In line with market expectations; guidance reiterated
- FY26 (May 2026 trading update): Revenue £27.2m and PBT £2.15m in line with consensus
Pattern: two consecutive years of positive surprise on the Siemens deal impact, transitioning to in-line delivery as consensus catches up. No profit warnings or guidance cuts observed in the covered period.
Conviction
Conviction: 3 (moderate).
Factors anchoring the valuation call:
- Clean disclosure and full segment reporting from FY25 onward, with clear Siemens revenue phasing
- Consistent recent track record of meeting or beating guidance
- Management's own medium-term target (£60m revenue, 30% EBITDA) provides an upside anchor
Factors limiting conviction:
- Wide range of plausible FY27+ outcomes as Siemens Enablement revenue rolls off; the underlying business run-rate is hard to pinpoint from disclosures
- OEM design-in cycles are long and hard to time; the "next Siemens" could arrive in FY27, FY28, or not at all